Which statement is NOT an advantage of video conferencing in a business setting?

Which statement is NOT an advantage of video conferencing in a business setting?

• A. No need to spend time or money travelling
• B. A very fast, reliable data link is needed: some companies hire a connection just for conferencing
• C. Everyone in the meeting needs access to suitable hardware and software
• D. It eliminates travel costs

Answer: (C)

Video conferencing reduces the need to travel, so it saves both time and money and allows people to meet from different locations. That’s why statements about not needing to travel and about eliminating travel costs are advantages. The idea that you must have a very fast, reliable data link is a practical requirement to get good video and audio quality; some organizations even hire dedicated connections to make sure the service runs smoothly, which supports the benefit but isn’t itself the advantage. The statement about everyone in the meeting needing access to suitable hardware and software introduces a barrier. Requiring all participants to have compatible equipment and licenses adds cost, setup time, and potential participation problems, which goes against the idea of it being an advantage.

Video conferencing reduces the need to travel, so it saves both time and money and allows people to meet from different locations. That’s why statements about not needing to travel and about eliminating travel costs are advantages. The idea that you must have a very fast, reliable data link is a practical requirement to get good video and audio quality; some organizations even hire dedicated connections to make sure the service runs smoothly, which supports the benefit but isn’t itself the advantage.

The statement about everyone in the meeting needing access to suitable hardware and software introduces a barrier. Requiring all participants to have compatible equipment and licenses adds cost, setup time, and potential participation problems, which goes against the idea of it being an advantage.